Good enough for basic and intermediate writing, but lacks of many interesting features. Musescore is a great piece of software, and it’s free!ĭon’t know any musicians who have used it yet. It’s nice, but output sounds are not enough in quality. ![]() ![]() Many of them also use musescore, and they have neutral opinions of its arrangement availabilities which is its only use for them. They think its a good place to start as its free and easy to use What do your friends/fellow musicians say about MuseScore? Pretty good, especially considering it’s free Pretty positive, fairly easy to get the hang of. ![]() Having community choirs access scores and be able to learn their vocal parts through an MuseScore group, on the MuseScore app is terrific. Muse score is excellent for its price (0) but comes short in terms of features Modern notation is bery limited, but there apparently is a wide selection of plugins online. Most common features are easy to use, but some non-elementary elements are hard to find or non intuitive to use. Generally an exceptional software considering it’s free.Ībsolutely the best, free common notation software that I’ve used. I find Musescore easy to use mostly, but there are some awkward steps when inputting notes going into/out of edit mode. Pretty useful, but often has problems when using extended notation. Musescore is easy to use and does the job however, it’s open-sources nature leaves holes in terms of professionalism and esteem, as well as playback, something important. Yet it lacks something that I can’t put my finger on that I’m hoping to find with finale. Musescore has served me very well in several of the projects I’ve undertaken. Table of contents Please comment on your experience with MuseScore Users say it is easy to use, but lacks playback functionality/quality and is more of a stepping stone to the big names (that aren’t free). In all, most users agree that it is the best value–a free program that can create great results for beginning, and many experienced, musicians. Table of Contents Section 1: What MuseScore Users Think, and What Their Peers Think About MuseScore Section 2: What Lilypond Users Think, and What Their Peers Think About Lilypond Section 3: What Dorico Users Think, and What Their Peers Think About Dorico What MuseScore Users Think, and What Their Peers Think About MuseScore The result is that while almost all of the comments make sense, some are a little out of context. out of context to the respondent’s prior responses. In order to preserve anonymity, I have left these as-is, i.e. Some respondents referenced their previous responses in these comments, so they may say something that doesn’t seem to directly address the question. Take a look and see for yourself! These are unedited comments. Dorico is thought of as the modern day tool that is rising quickly to the top, for its ease of use and functionality (even though some features are lacking). The reverse is true for Lilypond, but those who use it attest to the ability to create beautiful engravings. Most users agree that MuseScore is great for beginning musicians and for music that isn’t extremely complicated. I think you will find these comments quite interesting some reinforce the ideas of strengths and weaknesses of these programs, and others offer new perspectives. ![]() MuseScore, Lilypond, and Dorico User Reviews The comments from respondents who allowed me to publish their feedback are below. As part of the music notation software survey (see post Music Notation Software User Reviews), I collected comments from 16 MuseScore users, 5 Lilypond users, and 5 Dorico users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |